Reliability is an investment, not a cost. TCO connects the technical outputs of our RAM analysis directly to your financial bottom line, calculating the Net Present Value (NPV) and tax implications of every design decision.
Most financial models are built on guesses. Ours are built on engineering simulations. TCO bridges the gap between technical reliability and financial decision-making.
TCO creates a direct bridge between technical performance and financial outcomes
Technical Output
Direct Data Feed
Financial Output
A streamlined, iterative process that transforms engineering reliability data into CFO-ready financial intelligence
Financial models built on engineering data, not guesses
We take validated RAM outputs:
Every dollar in our TCO model is tied to real engineering data:
Custom financial model tailored to your organization
Custom TCO Analysis Spreadsheet combining RAM outputs + your financial data
We calculate TCO for multiple design alternatives:
Collaborative evaluation cycles until stakeholder sign-off
This is where the TCO methodology differs from traditional financial analysis. We don't deliver a spreadsheet and walk away—we refine it with you.
Share TCO analysis with stakeholders
CFO, Finance, Engineering review assumptions
Adjust model based on client feedback
Cycle repeats until stakeholder sign-off
CFO-ready documentation:
Traditional TCO models use generic assumptions. TCO uses engineering-validated reliability data to drive every financial calculation.
Direct data flow from RAM simulation to financial model—no manual assumptions or guesswork.
Complete lifecycle cost evaluation including depreciation, tax effects, and discount rate application.
Workshop-driven approach ensures finance, engineering, and operations teams are aligned on assumptions.
Justify reliability investments by quantifying the financial impact of redundancy, equipment quality, and maintenance strategy choices.
Provide CFOs and investment committees with bankable financial analysis tied to engineering validation, not generic assumptions.
Compare competing vendor proposals on a lifecycle cost basis, revealing hidden OPEX costs behind low CAPEX bids.
Evaluate the ROI of reliability upgrades, maintenance strategy changes, or equipment replacements in existing facilities.